The Typical Ford 2.3 EcoBoost Engine Issues. The 2.3L EcoBoost engine first appeared in the 2015 Mustang and Lincoln MKC. It has since been included into a number of other Ford and Lincoln models, including the Bronco, Maverick, and Edge. The EcoBoost’s turbocharged, direct injection architecture allows it to give excellent performance for its size. Ford’s 2.3 EcoBoost engines have also proven to be dependable. Unfortunately, no engine is perfect, and this is no exception. This page discusses Ford 2.3 EcoBoost issues and reliability.
Ford 2.3 EcoBoost Models and Information
The 2.3L EcoBoost engine, which debuted in the popular Ford Mustang and Lincoln MKC in 2015, is an inline-4 engine with a single twin-scroll turbocharger that delivers excellent performance for a tiny engine. Depending on the model and extras, the 2.3 EcoBoost produces between 270 and 345 horsepower. The popular Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost has 310 horsepower basic and 332 horsepower with the performance pack.
The 2.3 EB engine from Ford can be found in the following vehicles:
- Ford Mustang EcoBoost 2015+
- Ford Explorer 2016 and later
- Ford Focus RS from 2016 to 2018.
- Ford Focus ST (2019+)
- Ford Ranger 2019+
- Ford Everest 2020+
- Ford Bronco 2021+
- MKC 2015-2019 Lincoln
- Lincoln Corsair 2020+
The Ford 2.3 EcoBoost engine is found in a variety of Ford and Lincoln cars, as demonstrated. Furthermore, Ford has been producing EcoBoost turbo engines in a variety of configurations for the past decade. They’re tried-and-true engines that get the job done.
2.3 EcoBoost Common Issues
Among the most prevalent Ford 2.3 EcoBoost problems are:
- It gets hot.
- Carbon accumulation
- The head gasket (early Focus RS models)
During the rest of the essay, we will go through the 2.3 EcoBoost issues in detail. But, before proceeding, some notes must be included. These are some of the most frequent concerns, yet they are not common in the proper sense of the term. Instead, these are some of the most prevalent areas where Ford 2.3L EcoBoost problems occur.
Having said that, the 2.3 EcoBoost is shaping up to be a fantastic engine so far. No engine is flawless, and the Ford 2.3L engine is no exception. Issues can and do arise, but the 2.3L turbo inline-4 engine does not have a history of dependability concerns. So, let’s start with the most prevalent 2.3 EcoBoost issues and then return to overall reliability.
1) Ford 2.3L Hot Running
We’d like to talk about a few topics here. We strive to avoid mentioning early 2.3 EcoBoost issues that resulted in recalls. Nonetheless, it is an important prelude to what we truly want to talk about. Due to excessive underbody temperatures, Ford issued some recalls for the 2.3 EcoBoost in 2015. They noticed that the exhaust temperatures were higher than planned. This raised concerns about the possibility of excess heat causing breakdowns in parking brake wires, fuel vapor lines, and fuel tanks. Installing adequate heat shields was the only solution.
It brings us to our next topic, which cannot be considered a true concern. Turbo engines, on the other hand, frequently overheat. When air exits the turbo compressor wheel, it can reach temperatures of 250°F or more. The 2.3L EcoBoost then uses the intercooler to bring those temperatures down to as near to ambient as feasible. Under normal driving conditions, Ford’s factory intercooler performs admirably.
Models such as the Mustang and Focus, on the other hand, are designed to be high-performance vehicles. The power is available to be used, but when it is, charge air temperatures swiftly climb. This is especially important if you intend to alter or modify your 2.3 EcoBoost engine. Because of the increased chance of knock when charge air temperatures rise, the engine will reduce performance. Fortunately, there are options.
Managing 2.3 EB Hot Temperatures
Again, this is most likely a non-issue that should not be labeled as such. High charge air temperatures are rarely harmful to the engine or other components. Instead, the engine will merely pull timing to avoid knocking. Owners of the Mustang and Focus, on the other hand, may be more likely to rely on the performance of their 2.3 EcoBoost. Coming from a turbo automobile, heat-soak can be a vexing issue.
An improved intercooler is frequently the most straightforward remedy to heat-soak and excessive temperatures. If you intend to use the power frequently, the 2.3 EcoBoost engine improvement is certainly worth it. This is especially true for individuals wanting to tune their EcoBoost engines in hotter areas.
2) Carbon Build-Up Issues with the Ford 2.3 EcoBoost
Another aspect that isn’t really a concern with the 2.3L engine. Nonetheless, there is an additional maintenance cost that should be considered. Instead of port injection, the 2.3 EcoBoost engine employs direct injection (DI). Direct injection is a fantastic technology, but it does have a problem.
PI sprays gasoline into the intake ports, whereas DI flows fuel directly into the cylinder. Oil blow-by occurs in all engines to some extent. This is the process by which oil enters the digestive tract. The oil accumulates in the intake ports and adheres to the walls and valves.
There is no fuel going over the intake valves in the case of direct injection. As a result, carbon deposits might adhere to the valves, resulting in a carbon buildup. Some engines have a greater or lesser amount of natural oil blow-by than others. Nonetheless, many direct-injected engines should be serviced every 100,000 miles or so.
2.3 Signs of EcoBoost Carbon Build-Up
Some of the most common symptoms of carbon buildup are:
- Power outage
- Uneven idle, vibration, and shaking
As the carbon deposits accumulate, the airflow into the cylinders becomes restricted. Certain cylinders may accumulate more than others. As a result of the restricted airflow, you will eventually lose power. Rough idle, vibrations, or shaking may also be noticed. Misfires are frequently to blame for these symptoms.
Maintenance of EB Carbon Build-Up
Few 2.3 EcoBoost engines have surpassed 100,000 miles. Some of those who have reached that mileage are unlikely to have considered carbon build-up. It’s not usually something that needs to be done right away. But, with high-performance vehicles such as the Mustang 2.3L EcoBoost, you don’t want to be losing power. It’s always a good idea to keep the engine running smoothly. The following are the most effective methods for cleaning the intake valves:
- Blasting of walnuts
- Brush and brake cleaner
In our experience with many direct-injected vehicles, walnut blasting has shown to be the most effective means of cleaning the intake valves. You might be able to find a place to rent the necessary equipment. It’s not a difficult job, but it must be done correctly to avoid walnut media shells entering the cylinders. You can also use brake cleaner and let it soak on the valves before brushing away any deposits. You’d then need a shop vac to pick up any deposits or leftover brake cleaning. Walnut blasting is the favoured method once again. This maintenance can cost between $300 and $600 in a shop.
Ways to Avoid Carbon Buildup
Certain engines, such as the third-generation 5.0 Coyote and the second-generation 3.5L EcoBoost, use port-injection and direct-injection. The PI keeps fuel flowing over the intake valves to keep them clean. Several people try running oil catch cans, but the results aren’t always consistent. Catch cans were popular in the BMW world for many years, but the buzz has tapered down. An oil catch can assist delay the accumulation of carbon, but it will not fully avoid it.
The same is true for the 2.3 EcoBoost water-methanol injection. As the WMI is injected before the valves, it will most likely slow carbon deposits. Unfortunately, the flow is usually insufficient to totally eradicate carbon buildup.
3) Head Gasket Failure on a Ford 2.3 EcoBoost (Early RS Models)
This scarcely needs to be mentioned because it has already been discussed, and the issue appears to be restricted to early 2.3 EcoBoost Focus RS cars. These issues can be difficult to communicate at times. The internet has a nasty habit of exaggerating things. Unfortunately, problems can occasionally get swept under the rug. Still, we’ll keep this brief and leave it open-ended.
We thought it was worth mentioning in case there was something more serious going on. There don’t appear to be many, if any, head gasket failures on Mustangs or other models powered by the 2.3 EB. Likewise, the 2.3 EcoBoost is a fairly new engine. Time will tell if there are deeper concerns here, or if it was simply an error caused by the use of improper gaskets.
Reliability of the Ford 2.3L EcoBoost
Is the 2.3 EcoBoost long-term reliable? How long will the 2.3L EcoBoost engine last? These questions are still unknown. Nonetheless, all of the lights are currently green. The 2.3 EcoBoost engine does not yet have any serious design defects or common problems. Ford’s 3.5L and 2.7L EcoBoost engines have also proven popular. The 2.3 EcoBoost appears to be a dependable engine with a lengthy lifespan.
Yet, dependability is determined by a variety of factors. Of course, maintenance is a critical component. A well-maintained 2.3 EcoBoost engine should have no trouble reaching 200,000 kilometers. Yet, some of reliability is determined by the luck of the draw. This holds true for all engines and manufacturers. When well-kept engines fail prematurely, poorly maintained engines can go for hundreds of thousands of miles. It’s difficult to attribute that to anything other than luck of the draw.
2.3 EcoBoost longevity will also be tested by individuals who push the engines with tunes, bolt-on alterations, larger turbos, and so on. In general, the more power you apply to an unopened motor, the more likely there will be difficulties and a shorter life-span. If you intend to modify your 2.3 EcoBoost, make sure you don’t cut any corners. Otherwise, keep your engine well-maintained with suitable oils and oil change intervals. You’re likely to like your time with the 2.3L EcoBoost engine.
Summary of EcoBoost Issues
The 2.3L EB engine is proving to be a dependable engine with excellent performance for a small 4-cylinder engine. There are no major common engine flaws that have been discovered so far. Unfortunately, turbo engines get hot, and the 2.3L original intercooler may not be enough for people who push their cars hard or tune them. Direct-injected engines are also prone to carbon deposits on the intake valves, which can impair performance and drivability. We believe walnut blasting will be useful maintenance to perform every 100,000 kilometers.
Otherwise, the 2.3 EcoBoost is a fantastic engine. Maintenance, mods, how it’s driven, and luck of the draw can all contribute to reliability. However, we believe that the majority of well-maintained 2.3L EcoBoost engines will last 200,000 miles or more. All engines will have issues at some point in their careers, but the 2.3 EB is expected to be a robust, dependable engine.