The Ford Ranger vs. Ford Maverick

Posted on

The Ford Ranger vs. Ford Maverick. Ford’s Ranger and Maverick trucks were fantastic additions to the company’s vehicle roster. Contemporary 1/2 ton trucks, such as the F-150, frequently have more capabilities than the ordinary truck customer requires. Enter the Maverick vs. Ranger matchup. Both trucks aren’t as capable, but they’re both excellent trucks that can get the job done for less money. Because of their reduced size, they are also easier to park and drive in a crowded metropolis. But which truck is the better buy? In this post, we compare the specs, performance, towing, price, and other features of the Ford Ranger and Ford Maverick.

The Ford Ranger vs. Ford Maverick

Ford Maverick versus Ranger Specifications

The Maverick and Ranger have the following specifications:

Ford Maverick vs Ranger Specs

*From 1983 to 2012, Ford Ranger pickups were also produced as a small truck. The actual towing and cargo capacities are determined on the options selected. These figures show the maximum towing and payload; not all trucks can tow or carry these loads.

Of course, this isn’t a full breakdown of the two trucks’ specifications. They do, however, provide a clear image of the Ford Maverick versus Ranger contrast. The Ranger is a mid-size truck, but the Maverick is a tiny pickup. It’s over a foot longer and weighs 500 to 800 pounds heavier than the Maverick.

The bigger Ranger truck has a stronger engine, a 10-speed transmission, and more towing and payload capabilities. It falls between the larger, more capable F-150 and the entry-level Maverick.

EcoBoost 2.0 vs. 2.3 Hybrid

Both trucks are powered by an EcoBoost engine. The 2.3L inline-4 EcoBoost engine is the Ranger’s standard engine; it is currently the only engine option. A Maverick, on the other hand, comes equipped with a 2.5L Atkinson-cycle inline-4 hybrid engine. This engine is only available with front-wheel drive. If you desire AWD or the advanced 44, you must choose with the 2.0L inline-4 EcoBoost engine.

The 2.0 EcoBoost engine produces 250 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque. It’s not far behind the larger 2.3 EcoBoost, which has 270hp and 310 lb-ft of torque. Finally, the Maverick with the 2.5L Hybrid engine will provide the best fuel economy but lags behind in terms of performance.

We like the EcoBoost engines, and the 2.0L and 2.3L selections are pretty close. The larger engine in the Ford Ranger simply produces more power due to its larger displacement. For additional information, see our guides on 2.0 EcoBoost engine problems and 2.3 EcoBoost engine problems.

Read:  The P0301 Engine Fault Code : Symptoms - Causes and Solutions

Size Comparison: Maverick vs. Ranger

The size difference between the Maverick and Ranger trucks follows next. The Ranger, once again, is a mid-size truck, whereas the Maverick is a compact pickup. They’re both smaller than the F-150, with the Maverick being the smallest Ford truck and the Ranger falling somewhere in between.

The Ford Ranger SuperCab and SuperCrew are both 210.8 inches long, whereas the Maverick SuperCrew is just 199.7 inches long. Bed lengths for the Ranger and Maverick are 61-73′′ and 54.4′′, respectively. The Ranger’s bed is also roughly 2 inches wider.

Because of its smaller size, the Maverick weighs 500 to 800 pounds less than the Ranger. The size difference isn’t significant. The bigger Ranger, on the other hand, has a larger bed and a longer wheelbase. This clearly favors the Ranger when it comes to “truck stuff,” yet the Maverick is more nimble when it comes to parking and city driving.

Size and Interior Space

Despite the Ford Ranger’s bigger outward proportions, the Maverick has virtually similar inside room. In reality, the Maverick has larger headroom in the front and back, as well as more legroom in the back. The Ranger has 0.3 inches greater front legroom and is somewhat broader.

The inside space between the Ranger and Maverick is near enough that it’s unlikely to be a big deciding factor. The majority of the greater size of the Rangers is on the outside, hence the 6.5-18.5′′ extra bed area.

Comparison of Towing Capacity

The Maverick, being a compact truck, is constructed on the same chassis as the Ford Escape. That’s one of the reasons the Maverick has towing capability comparable to a small SUV or crossover. It has a maximum towing capability of 4,000 pounds, which is only 500 pounds more than the Escape. It also has a lower towing capability of 4,400 lbs than the Audi Q5 and BMW X3. Yet, the Maverick outperforms other SUVs in terms of payload capacity. Ford’s Maverick can take up to 1,500 lbs whilst the aforementioned SUV’s are rated in the low 1,000’s.

Read:  The Guide to the Mustang GT 5.0 Coyote Supercharger

Ford’s Ranger, on the other hand, can tow up to 7,500 pounds. This is comparable to large SUVs such as the Navigator and Suburban, and better than other mid-size vehicles such as the Chevy Colorado. It’s plenty to tow most boats under 25 feet as well as a variety of trailers and toys.

The Maverick’s towing capacity obviously pales in contrast. Yet, the Maverick is still adequate for most people’s needs. It is adequate for towing dirt motorcycles, ATVs, light boats, jet skis, and other similar items.

Price Comparison: Ford Maverick vs. Ranger

The following is the MSRP for the 2023 Ford Maverick and Ranger models:

Maverick is worth $22,195.

Ranger costs $27,400.

F-150: $34,445

The F-150 is also present to demonstrate the distinction between these smaller vehicles and a full 1/2 ton pickup. The Maverick, Ford’s smallest vehicle, is around $5,200 less than the Ranger and $12,200 less than the F-150. Rangers are around halfway between the Maverick and the F-150. This is true not only for pricing disparities, but also for other factors such as power, towing capability, size, and so on.

A Ford F-150 has the best hauling, performance, power, and overall capability. In those criteria, the Maverick is the worst, while the Ranger is squarely in the middle. Finally, these trucks are reasonably priced for each of their functions.

Finally, depending on the choices, you will most likely end up spending $2,000-5,000 more than the beginning Cost. Other trims are available for each truck, like as the Maverick Lariat, which starts at $27,955. AWD on the Maverick costs $2,200 more, while 4WD on the Ranger costs almost $3,600 more. A fully loaded Maverick could potentially cost $35,000 or more. A fully outfitted Ranger may cost around $50,000.

Related : Which EV reigns supreme: the Lucid Air or the Tesla Model S?

Synopsis of Maverick vs. Ranger

Ford did a fantastic job of integrating the Ranger and Maverick pickup trucks into their lineup. Contemporary 1/2 ton vehicles are frequently excessive for most truck owners’ needs. When properly equipped, the 2023 F-150 can tow up to 14,000 lbs. If you don’t require extreme towing capability but do need a bed (or simply prefer trucks for their numerous advantages), the Ranger vs Maverick can be excellent selections.

Read:  The Top 5 Honda Accord Modifications

The Maverick is Ford’s smallest truck and a compact pickup. It has two engine options, up to 250hp, and a towing capacity of 4,000 pounds. Ford’s Maverick is an excellent pickup for those who require a compact vehicle with adequate inside room and a truck bed. Yet, it may not be sufficient for individuals who intend to put their truck to work.

Here comes the Ford Ranger. This mid-size pickup truck sits well between the larger F-150 and the smaller Maverick. It has a strong performance with its 2.3 EcoBoost engine and 270 horsepower. It can tow up to 7,500 pounds, has a larger bed than the Maverick, and has a maximum payload of 1,905 pounds. If you want to perform a lot of “truck stuff,” like loading the bed or towing larger goods, the Ford Ranger is unquestionably the better choice.

To some extent, the Maverick and Ranger serve separate markets. The Maverick isn’t particularly powerful, but it does provide all of the benefits of having a truck. However, the Ford Ranger has more capability, but its larger size makes it less fuel efficient and less suitable for city driving.